Tall Order For New POTUS: Jobless rate at 14 year high, stock market has no bottom

Okay young man, here's your chance to change the world.  Today's jobless figures jumped to a 14 year high of 6.5%.  Yesterday the stock market fell through the floor dropping hundreds of points more, and with the unemployment news, today is not likely to be the day of rebound on Wall Street.

After you finish shooting hoops, courting lobbyists to serve in your administration, hire a few more partisan hacks to advise you and celebrate how you pulled one over on the American voter, how about coming up with a real plan to fix the world you are about to inherit?

If you do, you will go down as one of the great ones.  If you don't you'll just go down in the polls until Hillary and Bill find your Achilles heel and send you packing back to the windy city.

Comments

[BimBeau]

First thing for you to remember:
He inherited the jobless rate and joblessness is way higher than the 'official' rate. Your demi-god, Ronnie, changed the definition so the rate would go down.
To be classified as 'officially unemployed', one must:
1. Be drawing unemployment compensation
2. Seeking work
3. Not laid-off awaiting recall
4. Not retired drawing SS retirement benefits.

I am not unemloyed; I have no job. No difference - except to those of you out there who need to mislead with disinformation and falsehoods.

The honest definition is:
1. Employed at part-time or no job
2. Looking for work or a better job.

By adding the requirement that we be drawing unemployment, you have falsely depressed the critical statistic and falsely taken claim to a soundness that doesn't really exist.

I strongly advise the new administration to redefine unemployment rate, making it a more realistic measurement of the United States fiscal health.

[lly]

Is the game easy to learn how to play?
Yes. We strive to make all of our games easy to learn how to play, yet difficult to master.
Is Blizzard aware of some of the game play problems that have been prevalent in other MMORPGs?
Yes. Blizzard employees are gamers first and foremost, and we have played more than our fair share of existing massively multiplayer games. We tend to agree with MMORPG gamers on the strengths and weaknesses of the genre to date. We have striven to advance the genre with World of Warcraft by building on the positives already established in the genre and eliminating as many of the negatives as possible. We think we've done a successful job, but we hope you will try the game to see for yourself.
How do you prevent camping and kill stealing?
There are several things that have been implemented to limit this problem. First, there is "tapping." If you damage a monster first, you have thereby "tapped" it and thus only you and your party will gain experience and loot from it, even if another player attacks and kills it. We also limit camping and kill-stealing issues by "instancing" certain areas of the game. No other players, unless they are part of your group, can enter your instance.
How do you prevent camping and kill stealing in non-instanced areas?
Competition over rare item drops and quest items is the primary cause of camping and kill stealing. In World of Warcraft, many rare item drops are not exclusive to any one creature. Several creatures will have a chance of dropping the same item. If the required item is a quest item, the player can join a group of other players on the same quest. Every player on the quest will receive a copy of the quest item from the monster or location where it was found.
Are there other things to do besides leveling?
There is a huge variety of things to do to keep players from feeling like they just have to grind through one creature battle after another. Characters can craft items, fight in vast battles against other players, and explore distant lands. Even when players do fight monsters, it will often be as part of a quest, or in search of special ingredients for their crafts.
Is there a party system for group adventuring?
Yes. buy WOW Gold
How large is the party size for players?
The maximum number for a party is five players, and the game is generally balanced for groups of five. Smaller groups can still be quite successful, and regardless of the group's size, everyone in the group can make important contributions. You can also create larger groups of players, which are called raid groups.
Are there ways to gain experience in the game besides fighting?
Yes, there are ways to gain experience other than by fighting. You can gain substantial experience from doing quests. Exploring is another example of how you can gain experience; a character can receive experience by simply journeying to areas where your character has yet to explore.
How does group experience work?
All players in a group share experience for a kill. However, to offset the lesser experience that comes from grouping, all players in the group also get a group xp bonus depending on the number of players in the group. You gain more experience for kills if you group with players closer to your level, while you gain less if you group with players more than a few levels higher than you.
http://indihot.com/indihot-news/gautam-gambhir-banned-for-one-test.html#comment-9560

Is there a way to finish World of Warcraft? How long can I play?
There are thousands of hours of game play in the game (and even more in The Burning Crusade), and nearly infinite goals for players. Because our live team is regularly adding new quests, creatures, and items, the game will never truly end.

[BimBeau]

Oh - and since we're calling for accuracy here. Give credit where due. The Economic growth of the 90's is at least 40% attributable to Bush(41), some would say 60% because he started it all.

My thinking is more in line with 65% because he raised taxes to cover government spending at the end of an artificial expansion caused by his pursuit of Saddam.

[Redman]

Young man?

At least you didn't call him "boy".

Wow, Bimbo strongly advises. Clodhopper.

[bro43]

The unemployment rate is based off of labor dept and irs data and not who's collecting unemployment as was erronously reported above. The officials compare their data with the unemployment data to ensure proper extrapolation has been done. Points 3 & 4 are correct though. Info from snopes.com.