« March 2008 | Main | May 2008 »

April 2008

April 30, 2008

Is the non-stop talk about Wright, Wrong?

Rush, Sean and apparently the rest of the right leaning media have devoted too much time to re-hashing the comments of Obama's former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.  Frankly, I'm getting a little bored with it.  It's time to move on.

I understand the strategy; as long as the right wing media can keep hanging Wright's anti-American philosophy around Obama's neck the deeper the penetration and the more sticking power it has.  In addition, if this is the only topic of discussion then Obama may be kept off message and go on defense.

But this is an important election coming up.  And many conservatives are disappointed that there are really no great choices being offered by either party.  Neither democrat will get the conservative vote so McCain is safe in that regard.  And as between Hillary and Obama, the constant railing against Reverend Wright does little more than push Hillary to jump on that band wagon which would in all likelihood deny her the black vote should she somehow pull a nomination out of her bag of tricks.

There are many reasons why Obama is the wrong choice for America but any discussion of them is eclipsed by the wall to wall coverage of Jeremiah Wright's sermons and speeches.  The result of this strategy is the same, I am sure, for many others as it is for me, I have started to turn off the television, radio and to skip over other sources of these stories looking for something meatier.

The non-stop talk about Wright, is wrong. 

"Castle Doctrine" Faces New Challenge

The Lexington Herald Leader reports that a homeowner who shot through his front door and killed a man he says was trying to kick in the door, is caught in the middle of a legal battle over the "Castle Doctrine".

This new law allows a homeowner to use deadly force to prevent a burglary or an attempted burglary.  However in this case the homeowner shot through the door killing a man on the outside.  According to the article, questions are being raised whether the dead man, who had been sleeping off his intoxication in a neighbors driveway, was actually in the process of committing a burglary or merely confused as to which house his friend lived in and was knocking on the door.

This one may make it into the courts and ultimately to the Kentucky Supreme Court.  The homeowner is so far sticking to his story that the man was trying to "kick in" his door.  Of course, for his sake, he should be glad that dead men can't testify.  This one will likely turn on circumstantial evidence.

Morning Funnies

Obama_rev_wright_big_mouth

April 29, 2008

Ben Chandler To Go With Obama

PolWatchers is reporting that Ben Chandler will today announce that he will cast his vote as a super delegate in favor of U.S. Senator Barack Obama.  You know who Obama is right?  The flip flopping gun grabber who thinks we are bitter clingers.

Nicely done Ben.  What in the world does this get you?  Probably a strong challenger next go around I suspect.

Guest Column by Michael Reagan: "Saving The Children Is Our Job"

In the sad case of the children caught up in the maelstrom of the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints (FLDS) alleged child abuse matter, I tend to fall onto the church side in the separation of church and state.

The state is ill-equipped to deal with 400-plus youngsters it has torn from the bosoms of their mothers in the guise of protecting them from alleged abuses.

In considering this case it’s important to keep in mind some rather unpleasant facts:

In America, there are over 500,000 children in foster care;

Approximately 300,000 kids are taken out of their homes every year because of neglect and abuse, and put in foster care;

Some 73 percent of the children put in foster care end up on the streets, or even worse, in jail;

Even though some 100,000 of these 500,000 youngsters are available for adoption, only a pitiful 1.2 percent will ever be adopted.

These statistics should concern every American. It’s obvious that the government, which is great at starting wars and taxing the citizenry to pay for some of the worst hare-brained schemes imaginable, hasn’t got the slightest idea of how to raise children.

They know how to take children from their homes but they don’t know how to raise them once they’ve got them in their hands. Yet the idea that the government is better equipped than parents to raise children is widespread among the big-brother liberals who lust after inserting the power of the state into the very heart of the American family.

The reality is that when you take children from their mothers and put them in the hands of the state or its subordinate agents you ultimately do more damage to them than almost any abuse they might have suffered at home.

This is why I am calling on the Christian community and the churches to step up, take the children from the government, and assume their responsibility to keep these FLDS families together.

We need about 500 churches to take in 500 families. These children should be with their mothers, who are as much victims as their children are alleged to be. Splitting them up from their mother and their siblings is not going to be performing a service to these kids.

Just because we don’t agree with their lifestyle does not necessarily mean that we can do a better job than the mothers can do in raising them.

We should keep in mind that the allegations against the FLDS remain speculative and unproven, yet the government rushed in and disrupted whole families on the basis of a single phone call from a teenager who, if she even exists, can’t be found.

We’ve been through all of this kind of thing before. In the McMartin pre-school case during the 1980s, California government agencies acted on rumors that turned out to be absolutely false.

As Doug Linder wrote in 2003, the resulting McMartin Preschool Abuse Trial, which he called “the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history,” created a seven-year, $15 million investigation that led to not a single conviction.

“More seriously, the McMartin case left in its wake hundreds of emotionally damaged children, as well as ruined careers for members of the McMartin staff,” Linder recalled.

I’m not saying that the FLDS case is a replay of that notorious miscarriage of justice, but we surely must keep in mind the lessons it taught us about rushing to judgment and endangering the welfare of children before the real facts are known.

In the meantime, the Christian community needs to come forward and provide homes for the families and their children until all this can be sorted out.

Finally, as an afterthought we should be thankful that it is not Bill Clinton’s Attorney General, Janet Reno, running this operation against the FLDS Waco-style. If she were, by now the moms and their children would probably all be charred bodies in the smoking ruins of their compound.

Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is heard on more than 200 talk radio stations nationally as part of the Radio America Network. Look for Mike’s newest book, “Twice Adopted.” E-mail comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com.  Reprinted with permission.

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson: "Undoing America's Ethanol Mistake"

Senator Hutchinson has written a very good article this morning.  Here's a tease:

The Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman once said, "One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results."

When Congress passed legislation to greatly expand America's commitment to biofuels, it intended to create energy independence and protect the environment.

But the results have been quite different. America remains equally dependent on foreign sources of energy, and new evidence suggests that ethanol is causing great harm to the environment.

In recent weeks, the correlation between government biofuel mandates and rapidly rising food prices has become undeniable. At a time when the U.S. economy is facing recession, Congress needs to reform its "food-to-fuel" policies and look at alternatives to strengthen energy security.

READ ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE

The Candidate With The Best Energy Policy Will Become President

OPEC says oil will hit $200 per barrel.  The New York Sun predicts gasoline may jump to $10 per gallon.  The candidates are talking about a temporary hold on $0.18 gas taxes.  Where are the bold initiatives of Kennedy and Reagan?

When Kennedy became president he committed our nation to the space program and putting a man on the moon.  His optimism and the results it produced, from computers to medical treatment, propelled our nation forward like a rocket booster.

Ronald Reagan saw a Soviet Union which had devoted so much of its treasure to the arms race that its people were clamoring for change.  When Reagan committed our nation to build the "Star Wars" missile defense system, the Soviets knew they couldn't afford to keep up and they crumpled to their knees.

Now, facing not only terrible economic consequences of high fuel costs, but also the unsavory task of having to deal in middle eastern politics in part because of the oil markets there, what we need is a president who will commit our nation to becoming energy independent in 10 years.

This is a win, win, win situation.  First, we will have to calculate the best alternative to oil in its many applications.  America currently imports over 2 million barrels of oil per day. We get 40% of our oil from Canada, Mexico and Venezuela.  We import more oil than Japan, Germany and South Korea combined and we consume more than China, Japan and Germany combined.  This makes us a major player in the market place.  Some have suggested that we should get our oil from Iraq, but Iraq on its best day can only supply about 10% of our needs.  Currently we get 5% of our oil from Iraq and 2% from Kuwait.

Since we use 67% of our oil for transportation if we cut our import needs by 70% it would have a dramatic effect on the world price for oil.  So here is why a bold energy policy determined to find an alternative to oil for our transportation and other industrial needs would be such a win, win, win.

First it would inspire us as a nation to take the lead in developing important new technologies like we did during the "space race".  Second, the likelihood that we would move toward hydrogen fuel cells and away from internal combustion engines would mean that bio-fuels would no longer threaten to cause such dramatic increases in food prices.  Third, the elimination of air pollution from burning oil and the occasional water pollution problems associated with transporting oil across or under the oceans would be eliminated.

Additionally, if we were able to begin a pull back of our oil needs within 10 years the supply would be free from the pressure of our consumption and the price of oil should decline, thus making it easier for emerging nations to develop faster, thus creating more markets for our goods and would make us the single biggest marketer of alternative fuel technology to the world.

And lastly, reducing our oil consumptions would mean that our relationship with middle eastern oil producing countries would no longer be influenced by their extortionist tactics.

A comprehensive energy policy to develop gas from coal, develop nuclear energy for electric production and to develop a practical method for using hydrogen fuel cells as the preferred method of supplying transportation energy should all be components of any plan proposed by the candidates for President.  And I predict, the first one to convincingly roll out such a plan will win in November.

Morning Funnies

Photo_id

April 28, 2008

60 Minutes Interview With Justice Scalia Makes Important Point

When Justice Scalia sat down with 60 minutes for an interview he took the chance to make an important point.  Justices on the supreme Court are entitled to have personal viewpoints as well as general philosophies regarding the law.

However, as he was careful to point out, despite criticism of him, he decides cases based upon the law and not his personal beliefs. 

Justice Scalia spoke about his religious beliefs and his political beliefs and quite clearly made the point that in case after case, his goal is to interpret the constitution as an "originalist", that is to say, to interpret the words in the constitution according to the context of the time when they were written.

If you missed the interview you can watch it on the CBS website.

London Times To List "50 Most Influential Pundits"

The London Times has a great idea to keep people reading their online publication, come up with a list of the 50 most influential political pundits and publish ten at a time over the course of a week.  They put up 50-41 today.

Who do you think will be on the top of the list when they finally count down the top ten?

Images

SUPPORT

THIS PROJECT

Tip Jar

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

sc


Advertisements

  • Save The Ta-Tas

AlphaInventions

  • AlphaInventions Feed
    http://alphainventions.com/feed.xml

Copyright And Usage License

  • All content on this blog is copyrighted to Marcus Carey. All rights to all content on this blog are reserved to Marcus Carey. Any use of the ideas, imagery, analogies, analysis, comments or other content is subject to approval. You may link to any content on this site and approval to use content will be freely granted upon request subject to appropriate attribution.